However, for those who want to be able to select exactly what to backup and do so easily with any file types, ElephantDrive just does not fit the bill. That is, if you only need to backup photos, Word documents, music, videos, or other files that are only of a certain file extension, it should work great. The ElephantDrive service seems particularly well suited for category-based backups. With all other backup services we have evaluated thus far, file/folder selection is just a matter of checking off what you want to backup, and then it is “mirrored” online. With ElephantDrive, you must setup your folder configuration manually, just as you have already done on your own system (where much of that has been done automatically by software installations), which can be quite time consuming for those with well-categorized folders. File/folder selection is very cumbersome, as is viewing afterwards. We completely understand that it is a backup service and see how it works, but the user interface of the software is lacking, to say the least. While their speed is great, it is setup more like an upload service than a backup service. However, we took a day to evaluate the service. I would expect someone with a 100 Gigabyte backup to save about $700⁄yr using this option.We had not heard of ElephantDrive until your mention. I have heard excellent reports on JungleDisk, and if someone has very large backups, ranging in the 100 gig range or above, then the savings available from this option add up, particularly if the backups, once uploaded, didn't continue to have a lot of traffic so most of the charges would be storage only. Their software costs $20 and the extra service (called Jungle Disk Plus) costs $1⁄month. This makes much more sense for large backup stores. They have placed their own servers in Amazon's data centers so they can offer block level backup instead of full file backup. Grabbing the opportunity is a company called Jungledisk with backup software that works with S3 and also a service offering improvements. But, there is no real support and no software. ![]() While you'd pay about $25 to $30 per year from Amazon's S3. You can get 10 gigabytes from Ibackup for $100⁄yr. However, even adding it all up, the cost will come to about 25 or 30 percent of the cost of Ibackup (probably even less). Amazon charges a small fee per gigabyte plus a fee for bytes uploaded and another fee for downloading. They don't offer any software, however their prices are very low. They just provide the servers and the billing. Amazon offers a wholesale disk storage option called S3. The most interesting alternative is one I haven't checked out, but would actually like to try it. They seem to cause more conflicts, and have more frequent problems, but they cost less and may work well for you. They are less expensive, less robust options that work pretty well. I have used and have clients using both Carbonite and Mozy or MozyPro backups.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |